Financial Advisory Blog

Armanino’s Financial Advisory blog is your source for thought leadership around cloud ERP and accounting solutions and integrations. Supported by the Cloud Accounting Institute and numerous experts in cloud, finance, reporting, integration, compliance, and technology, Armanino’s Financial Advisory blog features must-read content on what’s happening in the finance industry, case studies, white papers, and much more.

July 23, 2020

We understand that the salary maximum for the eight-week Covered Period is $15,385 and for the 24-week Covered Period is $20,833. What if we apply for forgiveness after week 12? How is the salary max for forgiveness determined? Basically, we want to know how much of the salaries we are paying can count toward forgiveness.

Posted by Armanino Financial Advisory Team

First, let’s correct your opening statement. The maximum compensation for a 24-week Covered Period is $20,833 only for owners, not for employees. Employees are capped at $46,154 for this length of time. Based on your last sentence, we infer that you are asking about employees and not owners. If you were to apply for forgiveness after week 12, there is no guidance to suggest whether the maximum compensation for any employee is the full $46,154 of the 24-week Covered Period or half that ($23,077) for just 12 weeks. A technical reading of the guidance to date only references the eight-week maximum and the 24-week maximum, with no mention of what happens in between. Clearly you will have elected a 24-week Covered Period, since the only other option is an eight-week period which you have passed. Theoretically, this opens a very large loophole wherein a business could potentially pay a $240,000/year executive at full rate and get forgiveness for it, simply by filing for forgiveness after 10 weeks instead of eight when they would have been limited to just $15,385 ($240,000 per year = $4,615.40 per week times 10 weeks = $46,154). This is obviously not the intent of the Act, so we expect future guidance to clarify and close this loophole. Regardless, taking such a stance runs a high likelihood of SBA scrutiny.

« | »