Financial Advisory Blog

Armanino’s Financial Advisory blog is your source for thought leadership around cloud ERP and accounting solutions and integrations. Supported by the Cloud Accounting Institute and numerous experts in cloud, finance, reporting, integration, compliance, and technology, Armanino’s Financial Advisory blog features must-read content on what’s happening in the finance industry, case studies, white papers, and much more.

July 23, 2020

When looking at Step 1 of the Instructions for the PPP Schedule A Worksheet to determine if pay was reduced more than 25%, both line A and line B say to enter the hourly wage during the Covered Period. That seems to be asking for the wage per hour versus the total of all wages. We did not change anyone’s hourly rate but did reduce weekly hours from 55 to 40 hours per week. In comparing 1Q20 versus the Covered Period, are we looking at overall wages OR the hourly rate a person was getting during that time regardless of the number of hours?

Posted by Armanino Financial Advisory Team

Correct, it asks for “hourly wage”, meaning the rate per hour that you pay. Because you did not lower anyone’s hourly rate during the Covered Period as compared to Q1 2020, there is no Safe Harbor necessary or available to you. Furthermore, you had no employees with their hourly wage reduced by over 25%, so you will have no reduction factor to apply. On the other hand, had you actually had some employees whose average rate per hour did decline by more than 25%, then you would need to go through the Safe Harbor calculation (to see if you have that available to you), and if not, you’d have to go through the Salary/Wage Reduction Factor calculation which is where the impact of your Q1 overtime hours would show up — In this calculation, you multiply the amount of the hourly rate that exceeds a 25% reduction by the average hours worked during Q1, not during the Covered Period.

« | »